Michael Jackson's Trials

Michael Jackson's Trials

Text

The Ongoing Trials of The Late Michael Jackson

Friday, April 08, 2005

Jackson Kissed Caulkin

Adrian McManus, another co-plaintiff of Chacon, testified in the Jackson trial yesterday.

She described Macaulay Caulkin as being very wild and destructive then.

Quote:

"I saw Mr. Jackson and Macaulay in the library..Mr. Jackson was kissing him on the cheek, and he had his hand by his leg, by his rear end,"

Caulkin has always denied ever being molested by Jackson.

McManus said she saw Jackson engage in the same actions with others, including Jordie Chandler.

Quote:

"I saw Mr. Jackson kissing on Jordie, his cheek, his mouth..[Jackson's] hand was on his crotch. I was shocked. Flushed. I didn't say nothing. I stayed up there very quietly and waited for them to leave,".

Tom Mesereau asked:

"You said [in the deposition] that you trusted Michael Jackson and would leave your own son alone with him, isn't that right?".

McManus agreed, and Mesereau continued:

"You originally said that you never saw Jordie Chandler alone in Michael Jackson's bedroom...Are you telling this jury that throughout this deposition you committed perjury?"

To which McManus responded:

"I believe the whole time, I did not tell the truth,".

2 comments:

  1. Anonymous4:46 PM

    Jackson Fondled Macaulay Culkin, Cook Says
    By Dan Whitcomb and Alexandria Sage

    During a break in testimony, Judge Rodney Melville
    barred the defense from raising the issue of LeMarque's later work as the operator of a pornographic Web site.

    Visit link
    http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=765&ncid=787&e=5&u=/nm/20050408/people_nm/crime_jackson_dc

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous8:30 PM

    level of truth

    --- Chacon acknowledged that he met with Sneddon this week and gave him additional details. ---

    Visit link
    http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=762&e=1&u=/ap/20050408/ap_en_mu/michael_jackson&sid=84439559

    If a witness is gauged by the level of embellishment, then this statement could lead a person to believe that the witness is/was lying...

    Is it Chacon for embellishing, with additional details ?????

    What does this say about the believability of the witness ?????

    ReplyDelete